Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Chippewa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Chippewa
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,735,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 28.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.73% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 70.6% |
Range | 29.6% | 65.9% |
Mean | 10.9% | 19.0% |
Median | 9.1% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Blackfeet (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 11.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 11.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 11.3% |