Israeli vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Israeli
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Israelis
Choctaw
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 36.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.6% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 16.5% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |