Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Choctaw
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,320,666 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 36.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 59.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 51.9% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 25.1% | 41.2% |
| Median | 21.7% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.7% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |