Immigrants from Iran vs Luxembourger Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Luxembourger
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Luxembourgers
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Luxembourger Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,394,600 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 0.68%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.76% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 13.1% |
Range | 15.0% | 12.7% |
Mean | 6.3% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran and Luxembourgers by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |