Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Dominica Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Immigrants from Dominica
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Immigrants from Dominica
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Dominica Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,188,736 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,788,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 3.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from Dominica |
Minimum | 0.74% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 36.5% | 54.5% |
Range | 35.8% | 52.1% |
Mean | 14.4% | 18.0% |
Median | 14.3% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Dominica by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |