Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,796,197 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,202,367 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 3.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia |
Minimum | 0.90% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 43.0% | 45.5% |
Range | 42.1% | 40.2% |
Mean | 14.3% | 17.3% |
Median | 13.3% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 20.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Osage (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 0.96%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |