Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Denmark Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Denmark
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Denmark
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Denmark Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,675,853 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,395,375 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.80%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from Denmark |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 72.8% | 48.4% |
| Range | 70.1% | 46.1% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 11.2% |
| Median | 11.6% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Denmark by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), English (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |