Immigrants from England vs Indian (Asian) Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Indian (Asian)
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Indians (Asian)
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Indian (Asian) Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,675,853 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 72.8% | 21.9% |
Range | 70.1% | 19.5% |
Mean | 16.7% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.6% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Indians (Asian) by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Austrian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Netherlands (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |