Immigrants from Chile vs Armenian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Armenian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Armenians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Armenian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,592,418 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,749,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Armenian |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 26.9% |
| Range | 20.6% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 12.6% |
| Median | 11.8% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Armenians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |