Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,592,418 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,418,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 29.8% |
| Range | 20.6% | 29.4% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 11.9% |
| Median | 11.8% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |