Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Yugoslavians
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,266,194 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 17.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 36.2% | 30.2% |
| Range | 29.7% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 12.4% |
| Median | 15.8% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |