Immigrants from Bolivia vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Indian (Asian)
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Indians (Asian)
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,883,444 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,253,971 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 0.59%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 3.6% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 82.5% | 26.6% |
Range | 78.9% | 21.9% |
Mean | 19.6% | 15.3% |
Median | 17.3% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Indians (Asian) by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.76%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.91%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |