Polish vs Turkish Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Turkish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Poles
Turks
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Turkish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,734,720 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 75.7% | 20.5% |
| Range | 75.2% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 9.0% |
| Median | 9.2% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Turks by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Iranian (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Moldova (10.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Singapore (10.9%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |