Croatian vs Turkish Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Turkish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Turks
10.6%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Turkish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,543,328 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 3.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 20.5% |
| Range | 31.2% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 10.0% | 9.0% |
| Median | 9.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Turks by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.74%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Moldova (10.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.9%, a difference of 0.65%), Korean (10.9%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Iran (10.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and Russian (10.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |