Cuban vs Potawatomi Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Potawatomi
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Potawatomi
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Potawatomi Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,858,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,742,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.010%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 5.8% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 63.6% |
Range | 25.5% | 60.6% |
Mean | 15.8% | 20.2% |
Median | 14.6% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 24.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Potawatomi by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |