Nicaraguan vs Potawatomi Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Potawatomi
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Nicaraguans
Potawatomi
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Potawatomi Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,582,633 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,742,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.21%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nicaraguan | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 2.4% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 35.3% | 63.6% |
Range | 32.9% | 60.6% |
Mean | 15.5% | 20.2% |
Median | 14.6% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 24.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Potawatomi by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |