Cuban vs Nicaraguan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Nicaraguan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Nicaraguans
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Nicaraguan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,858,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,582,633 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.20%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Nicaraguan |
Minimum | 5.8% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 35.3% |
Range | 25.5% | 32.9% |
Mean | 15.8% | 15.5% |
Median | 14.6% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Nicaraguans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |