Cuban vs Osage Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Osage
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Osage
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Osage Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,858,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,919 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 3.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Osage |
Minimum | 5.8% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 31.5% |
Range | 25.5% | 29.7% |
Mean | 15.8% | 14.9% |
Median | 14.6% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Osage by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |