Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,858,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,266,194 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.38%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 36.2% |
| Range | 25.5% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 15.8% | 17.0% |
| Median | 14.6% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |