Chinese vs Immigrants from Denmark Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,773,263 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of $116,156. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,366,596 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of $116,000, a difference of 0.13%.

Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Immigrants from Denmark
Minimum	$52,969	$2,499
Maximum	$203,211	$250,001
Range	$150,242	$247,502
Mean	$114,652	$116,363
Median	$110,020	$112,813
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$93,748	$81,964
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$132,670	$143,426
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$38,922	$61,462
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$33,042	$57,800
Standard Deviation (Population)	$32,746	$56,968

Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Denmark by Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Russian ($116,328, a difference of 0.15%), Latvian ($115,957, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Switzerland ($115,934, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Asia ($116,566, a difference of 0.35%), and Maltese ($114,754, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Latvian ($115,957, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland ($115,934, a difference of 0.060%), Russian ($116,328, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Asia ($116,566, a difference of 0.49%), and Maltese ($114,754, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional $118,871
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional $118,498
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional $118,426
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional $118,318
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional $117,930
Turks	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional $117,814
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional $117,750
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional $117,731
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional $116,566
Russians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional $116,328
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $116,156
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $116,000
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $115,957
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $115,934
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $114,754
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $114,434
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $114,407
Cambodians	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $114,342
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $114,336
Estonians	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $114,220
Israelis	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $114,186