Chickasaw vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Scottish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Scottish
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,662,179 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 35.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Scottish |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 16.0% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 18.6% |
| Median | 7.0% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 22.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Northern European (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (4.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Swiss (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |