Choctaw vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Scottish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Scottish
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,584,402 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,662,179 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 47.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Scottish |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 28.3% | 97.4% |
Mean | 10.7% | 18.6% |
Median | 8.8% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 22.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Northern European (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (4.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Swiss (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |