Chickasaw vs Apache Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Apache
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Apache
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Apache Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,238,952 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 54.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Apache |
Minimum | 1.7% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 17.6% | 52.5% |
Range | 16.0% | 48.2% |
Mean | 7.8% | 17.8% |
Median | 7.0% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 12.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Apache by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 5.4%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and Crow (9.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |