Chickasaw vs Portuguese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Portuguese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Portuguese
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Portuguese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,135,508 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 25.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Portuguese |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.98% |
Maximum | 17.6% | 17.2% |
Range | 16.0% | 16.2% |
Mean | 7.8% | 4.7% |
Median | 7.0% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Italy (4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Poland (4.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Korean (4.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Belgium (4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Norway (4.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Basques | 98.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 98.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Portuguese | 98.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.3 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 98.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Yugoslavians | 97.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Asians | 97.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 4.7% |