Chickasaw vs Guatemalan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Guatemalan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Guatemalans
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Guatemalan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 406,520,979 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 21.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Guatemalan |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 17.6% | 42.2% |
Range | 16.0% | 40.1% |
Mean | 7.8% | 11.9% |
Median | 7.0% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Spanish American Indian (7.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Hopi (7.1%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Dominica (7.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Armenia (7.1%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |