Cherokee vs Ottawa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Ottawa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Ottawa
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Ottawa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,944,189 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.11%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Ottawa |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 28.7% |
| Range | 50.6% | 25.5% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 11.6% |
| Median | 16.3% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Ottawa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |