Cherokee vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Middle Africa
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,607,111 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.478 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 2.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 28.0% |
| Range | 50.6% | 27.6% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 11.3% |
| Median | 16.3% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.53%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |