Cherokee vs Nepalese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Nepalese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Nepalese
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Nepalese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Nepalese |
Minimum | 3.6% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 31.9% |
Range | 50.6% | 27.2% |
Mean | 17.8% | 13.4% |
Median | 16.3% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 15.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Nepalese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |