Tsimshian vs Ottawa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Ottawa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Ottawa
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Ottawa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,944,189 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 2.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Ottawa |
Minimum | 8.5% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 21.8% | 28.7% |
Range | 13.2% | 25.5% |
Mean | 13.7% | 11.6% |
Median | 13.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 14.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Ottawa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |