Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Nicaragua
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,310,825 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 0.19% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 53.4% |
| Range | 50.6% | 53.2% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 13.6% |
| Median | 16.3% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |