Basque vs Icelander Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Icelander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
Icelanders
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Icelander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,726,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.34%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Basque | Icelander |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 35.4% | 33.3% |
Range | 34.4% | 32.9% |
Mean | 12.9% | 11.8% |
Median | 12.2% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Icelanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |