Basque vs French Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
French
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
French
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
85.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs French Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,726,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 571,140,753 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.48%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Basque | French |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 35.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 34.4% | 98.2% |
Mean | 12.9% | 18.1% |
Median | 12.2% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 17.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and French by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |