Choctaw vs Icelander Female Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Icelander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Icelanders
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Icelander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,592,766 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 29.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Icelander |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 68.1% | 33.3% |
| Range | 58.1% | 32.9% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 11.8% |
| Median | 21.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |