Basque vs Chilean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Chilean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
Chileans
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
84.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Chilean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,726,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,534,344 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.31%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Basque | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 35.4% | 25.4% |
Range | 34.4% | 22.9% |
Mean | 12.9% | 11.0% |
Median | 12.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Chileans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), French (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |