Basque vs Hungarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Hungarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
Hungarians
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Hungarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,726,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,692,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Basque | Hungarian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 35.4% | 73.9% |
Range | 34.4% | 72.6% |
Mean | 12.9% | 18.8% |
Median | 12.2% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 26.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Hungarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |