Bahamian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bahamian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bahamians
Immigrants from South Central Asia
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,412,919 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,887,426 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 53.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bahamian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.66% |
Maximum | 43.3% | 12.4% |
Range | 41.8% | 11.8% |
Mean | 8.9% | 3.6% |
Median | 6.8% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.29%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and Arapaho (6.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |