Arapaho vs Immigrants from Dominica Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arapaho
Immigrants from Dominica
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Arapaho
Immigrants from Dominica
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Dominica Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,777,916 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,788,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 0.060%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Immigrants from Dominica |
Minimum | 9.4% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 58.3% | 54.5% |
Range | 48.9% | 52.1% |
Mean | 24.5% | 18.0% |
Median | 22.0% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Immigrants from Dominica by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |