Arapaho vs Immigrants from Congo Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arapaho
Immigrants from Congo
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Arapaho
Immigrants from Congo
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Congo Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,777,916 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,087,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 0.48%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Immigrants from Congo |
Minimum | 9.4% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 58.3% | 41.7% |
Range | 48.9% | 40.8% |
Mean | 24.5% | 18.6% |
Median | 22.0% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 21.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |