Arapaho vs Dutch West Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arapaho
Dutch West Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Arapaho
Dutch West Indians
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Dutch West Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,777,916 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,761,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Dutch West Indian |
Minimum | 9.4% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 58.3% | 43.3% |
Range | 48.9% | 33.7% |
Mean | 24.5% | 19.7% |
Median | 22.0% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 20.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Dutch West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |