Arapaho vs Guatemalan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arapaho
Guatemalan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Arapaho
Guatemalans
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Guatemalan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,777,916 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,219,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 4.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Guatemalan |
Minimum | 9.4% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 58.3% | 65.8% |
Range | 48.9% | 61.2% |
Mean | 24.5% | 22.9% |
Median | 22.0% | 19.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 25.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Guatemalans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |