Apache vs Tohono O'odham Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Tohono O'odham
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Apache
Tohono O'odham
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Tohono O'odham Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,585,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 34.2%, a difference of 23.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 16.4% | 23.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 83.6% | 76.7% |
| Mean | 48.6% | 57.1% |
| Median | 40.7% | 53.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.1% | 29.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.0% | 83.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.9% | 54.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 28.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 27.8% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Tohono O'odham by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 3.6%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |