Apache vs Central American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Central American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Apache
Central American Indians
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Central American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,666,158 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 25.5%, a difference of 8.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache | Central American Indian |
Minimum | 16.4% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 83.6% | 89.0% |
Mean | 48.6% | 37.6% |
Median | 40.7% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.1% | 24.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.0% | 49.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.9% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 18.2% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Central American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |