Apache vs Menominee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Menominee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Apache
Menominee
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Menominee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,620,212 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 27.8%, a difference of 0.46%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Menominee |
| Minimum | 16.4% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 83.6% | 91.7% |
| Mean | 48.6% | 35.4% |
| Median | 40.7% | 33.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.1% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.0% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.9% | 17.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 20.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Menominee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.71%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.3%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |