Cheyenne vs Tohono O'odham Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cheyenne
Tohono O'odham
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Cheyenne
Tohono O'odham
30.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cheyenne vs Tohono O'odham Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,467,038 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 30.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,585,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 34.2%, a difference of 12.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cheyenne | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 18.0% | 23.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.0% | 76.7% |
| Mean | 46.7% | 57.1% |
| Median | 37.1% | 53.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.3% | 29.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.6% | 83.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 34.3% | 54.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.6% | 28.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.2% | 27.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne and Tohono O'odham by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Pima (30.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 0.81%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 2.8%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 3.6%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |