Apache vs Yuman Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Yuman
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Apache
Yuman
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Yuman Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,574,686 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 29.4%, a difference of 6.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache | Yuman |
Minimum | 16.4% | 12.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 83.6% | 87.3% |
Mean | 48.6% | 43.1% |
Median | 40.7% | 39.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.1% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.0% | 52.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.9% | 30.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 24.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Yuman by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Colville (29.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |