Ute vs Colville In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Ute
Colville
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Ute
Colville
80.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Colville In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,662,248 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 80.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,682,353 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colville and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 81.6%, a difference of 1.0%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Colville |
Minimum | 16.2% | 21.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 83.8% | 78.1% |
Mean | 79.2% | 76.3% |
Median | 81.7% | 80.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.9% | 71.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 86.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.1% | 15.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.0% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 18.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Colville by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Seminole (81.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Shoshone (81.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Kiowa (81.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Alaska Native (81.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Comanche (81.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |