Ute vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Ute
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Ute
Chickasaw
80.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,662,248 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 80.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,700,460 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 16.2% | 37.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 83.8% | 62.8% |
Mean | 79.2% | 79.6% |
Median | 81.7% | 79.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.9% | 74.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 88.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.1% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.0% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Comanche (81.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Seminole (81.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colville (81.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 82.2% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |