Ute vs Colville Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Colville
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Ute
Colville
35.7%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
39.3%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Colville Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,474,720 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 35.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,541,022 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 39.3%, a difference of 10.0%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Colville |
Minimum | 21.7% | 16.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 78.3% | 83.2% |
Mean | 53.3% | 48.6% |
Median | 47.4% | 47.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.9% | 34.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.2% | 60.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.8% | 18.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Colville by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Seminole (35.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Ottawa (35.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (35.5%, a difference of 0.69%), Yakama (36.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Choctaw (36.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Sioux (38.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Crow (38.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Pima (38.6%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Yemen (38.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and Cheyenne (38.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 35.7% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 35.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 36.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 36.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 36.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 36.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 36.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 36.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 37.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 37.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 37.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 38.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 38.6% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 38.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 38.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 40.2% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 40.3% |