Ute vs Colville In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Ute
Colville
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Ute
Colville
78.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Colville In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,664,473 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 78.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,677,066 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colville and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 80.7%, a difference of 2.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Colville |
Minimum | 23.7% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 76.3% | 94.1% |
Mean | 73.4% | 72.1% |
Median | 75.4% | 75.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 59.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.0% | 88.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.3% | 28.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 22.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Colville by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Seminole (80.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Dutch West Indian (81.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.41%), Creek (80.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Cheyenne (81.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |