Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Chickasaw
84.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
11.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,704,105 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 84.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,707,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 80.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 61.3% | 39.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 38.7% | 61.0% |
Mean | 85.0% | 77.5% |
Median | 84.8% | 78.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 80.9% | 73.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.4% | 82.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are European (84.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Nicaraguan (84.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Barbados (84.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Israeli (84.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Bangladeshi (84.1%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
New Zealanders | 16.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 15.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 84.1% |
Israelis | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 84.1% |
Bangladeshis | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 13.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 84.1% |
Europeans | 12.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 84.1% |
Nicaraguans | 12.1 /100 | #216 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 84.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 9.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 84.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 9.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 84.1% |
French | 7.5 /100 | #220 | Tragic 84.0% |
Icelanders | 6.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 84.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 6.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 84.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 6.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 84.0% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 6.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 84.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |